>>32638038The internet can make porn out of everything. When something is obviously there to be objectified, though, it's pretty obvious why it was made: fanservice. Here's some examples of what I mean.
> Not Obvious Objectification Objects:Absol, Charizard, Glaceon
Note the lack of human characteristics. This is basically "dog fucker" tier to most people and people question why others fap to this.
> Questionably FanserviceGardevior, Zoroark, Incineroar
Have human characteristics but also claim it's because they were going for a "theme" and the human shape was unavoidable. Gardevior is suppose to be a helmeted knight in a tunic ("Sirknight" line). Zoroark is a fox-woman or "Kitsune". Incinerorar is Tiger Mask only quite literally a tiger wrestler. People argue about it being fap material.
> Clearly FanserviceMega Gardevior, Lopunny, Tsaareena
Any design reasons are flimsy at best and feel like an excuse to show off big titted anime women. Mega Gardevior is obviously a woman in a dress. Lopunny has no reason to be a bunny with big "chest fluff". So the Mangosteen is the "queen of fruit"- that's no reason to give Tsareena massive hips/butt/thighs. People argue about this *not* being made to be fap material.
