/vp/ - Pokémon » Thread #32726941

[34 / 7 / ?]

43KiB, 200x247, 1495706751237.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

/vp/ is for underage?

Anonymous Fri 09 Jun 2017 13:36:17 No.32726941 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>32726960 >>32727795 >>32728862 >>32730002

http://www.strawpoll.me/13146497
It's time to know the truth.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 09 Jun 2017 13:40:31 No.32726956 Report

Quoted By:

Would be more effective had you made several options asking for age, not just underage/not

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 122hp42.gif, 2MiB, 480x242

Anonymous Fri 09 Jun 2017 13:41:01 No.32726960 Report

Quoted By:

>>32726941
Retard

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 09 Jun 2017 13:41:45 No.32726962 Report

Quoted By: >>32726973 >>32727039

Anon, youre getting nowhere
Underages wont just say "yeah im 15 and fap to fictional animals"

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 09 Jun 2017 13:43:30 No.32726973 Report

Quoted By: >>32731014

>>32726962
why? there's no consequences

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 09 Jun 2017 13:44:06 No.32726975 Report

Quoted By: >>32727075

Underage is also different between countries. Canadians aren't underage in Canada when they're 16, for example.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 09 Jun 2017 14:00:59 No.32727039 Report

Quoted By:

>>32726962
they're not going to say here, but they honestly have no reason to lie on the strawpoll, nobody knows who is who

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 09 Jun 2017 14:08:55 No.32727075 Report

Quoted By: >>32727792

>>32726975
You idiot it's clearly referring to the site's 18+ rule

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 09 Jun 2017 14:19:13 No.32727115 Report

Quoted By: >>32727126 >>32727135 >>32727404 >>32727781 >>32728096

Personally I'm not underage but I don't quite get the +18 rule on this board. /vp/ is already a completely SFW board to a franchise aimed towards CHILDREN. It sounds ridiculous to me that the Nintendo's target audience can't post here, on probably the biggest concentration of Pokemon fans in the Internet.
As the poll shows, there are already underages among us posting, keeping it quiet in fear of getting banned. Not to mention the potential boost in site traffic if the restriction was removed.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 09 Jun 2017 14:21:39 No.32727126 Report

Quoted By: >>32727141

>>32727115
It's still 4chan. Legally the site can't give teens free reign to post, even Facebook has age restrictions.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 09 Jun 2017 14:23:41 No.32727135 Report

Quoted By: >>32727154

>>32727115

>Not to mention the potential boost in site traffic if the restriction was removed.

why are you saying that like it's a good thing?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 09 Jun 2017 14:24:35 No.32727141 Report

Quoted By:

>>32727126
Yes, but Facebook is 13+.
Is it really impossible to remove an age restriction on specific boards?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 09 Jun 2017 14:26:36 No.32727154 Report

Quoted By:

>>32727135
Because more traffic = more money from ads = better financial situation of the website.
Remember when Hiroshimoot said the website doesn't make enough money to sustain itself?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 09 Jun 2017 15:09:14 No.32727404 Report

Quoted By:

>>32727115
>Personally I'm not underage but
Underage spotted

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 09 Jun 2017 16:05:46 No.32727770 Report

Quoted By: >>32727782 >>32727784 >>32727809 >>32728007 >>32728118 >>32728793

well im 17 so i guess im underage but its only by one year

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 09 Jun 2017 16:07:17 No.32727781 Report

Quoted By:

>>32727115
>even a pokemon based on playboy bunnies and a pokemon that literally includes the words "reverse harem" in its dex entry aren't sexualized.
>>>/global/rules/2
You have to go back.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1492782392384.jpg, 9KiB, 300x300

Anonymous Fri 09 Jun 2017 16:07:20 No.32727782 Report

Quoted By:

>>32727770

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 09 Jun 2017 16:07:58 No.32727784 Report

Quoted By:

>>32727770
Enjoy your one year ban.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 09 Jun 2017 16:08:25 No.32727792 Report

Quoted By: >>32728016

>>32727075
>18+ on a blue board

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 09 Jun 2017 16:08:43 No.32727795 Report

Quoted By:

>>32726941
Being underage has no meaning when you consider that moot created 4chan when he was 15

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 09 Jun 2017 16:10:27 No.32727809 Report

Quoted By:

>>32727770
Pretty sure every single underage that voted is at least above 13, otherwise we'd see a lot of "lol xDDDDDD" on this board.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 200.gif, 1MiB, 306x200

Anonymous Fri 09 Jun 2017 16:38:38 No.32728007 Report

Quoted By:

>>32727770

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 09 Jun 2017 16:40:06 No.32728016 Report

Quoted By:

>>32727792
Hello underage

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 09 Jun 2017 16:51:42 No.32728096 Report

Quoted By: >>32728875 >>32729961 >>32730077

>>32727115
>/vp/ is already a completely SFW board

People post porn and other gross fetish shit related to Pokemon here almost everyday.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 09 Jun 2017 16:55:09 No.32728118 Report

Quoted By:

>>32727770
bye

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 09 Jun 2017 18:25:23 No.32728793 Report

Quoted By:

I'm guessing >>32727770 got banned because he "Lol yES I'm underage up top XD"?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 09 Jun 2017 18:36:44 No.32728862 Report

Quoted By: >>32728884

>>32726941
I feel the underage are gonna say they're not.
The ones saying yes are probably of age and trolling you, OP.

Did you honestly expect accurate results?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO NAOS.png, 1MiB, 1920x1080

Anonymous Fri 09 Jun 2017 18:38:44 No.32728875 Report

Quoted By:

>>32728096
>mods not doing their job

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO usa_sp.png, 12KiB, 667x337

Anonymous Fri 09 Jun 2017 18:40:19 No.32728884 Report

Quoted By: >>32728900

>>32728862
So you're saying the results are the opposite of what it really is?
The truth revealed :^)

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 09 Jun 2017 18:42:08 No.32728900 Report

Quoted By: >>32730077

>>32728884
I never said directly opposite.

Just potentially horribly inaccurate.

You assume people were honest with those answers? I know I wasn't at least.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 09 Jun 2017 21:10:57 No.32729961 Report

Quoted By: >>32730077

>>32728096
As they do on Facebook, but in both instances it is forbidden and quickly removed

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 55d.gif, 964KiB, 245x225

Anonymous Fri 09 Jun 2017 21:17:13 No.32730002 Report

Quoted By:

>>32726941
>/vp/
>for underage
There's a reason why /sug/ was moved to /trash/. There's a reason why MLP was given it's own board. That reason isn't just because it's popular and clogging up the threads, it's because people keep putting shit in those boards like foot fetishes, vore, and stuff that isn't SFW.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 09 Jun 2017 21:25:17 No.32730077 Report

Quoted By:

>>32728096
>almost

>>32729961
>quickly

>>32728900
Underage detected

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 09 Jun 2017 23:31:09 No.32731014 Report

Quoted By:

>>32726973
>being this new

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches

/vp/ is for underage?