>>33000014>revealed your samefaggingI've been the one posting Simpsons screenshots this entire time, but that's it. Is it that unthinkable to you that other people are going to call you out on being a high-functioning retard?
>>33000014OK, so are viruses "stronger" than elephants because an elephant can die as a result of disease? No, of fucking course not, because we're not talking generally about how dangerous a thing is, we're talking about physical fucking strength.
When you look at two members of the same species, all else being equal apart from mass (i.e. neither party is sick, injured, elderly, etc.), the larger subject is almost always going to be stronger -- this is not hard to understand, and apart from a few exceptions, this isn't even debatable.
These fucking dweebs arguing about how "uh, actually, the smaller, more lithe party is faster and more lean, so he has the upper hand" have obviously never had any experience fighting anyone before -- try fighting a friend who has 100 pounds, or even 50 pounds on you: if both of you have roughly the same combat experience, the larger party is almost always going to win -- this is literally why weight classes exist in combat sports you fucking moron.
This also applies to sexual dimorphism, where, in a species with one gender being substantially larger than the other, that gender is almost always stronger. Again, this is not hard to understand.
