>>33014262Whatever, I've said my piece. Thanks for at least replying in a constructive way.
>>33014919Oh yeah? If it's an act, where does she break the act, exactly? Literally the only mention of her age is in a phone call about how she's hungry, then she backpedals that she's eating a normal amount for her age. I've never heard any adult mention their age factoring into how much they eat. In fact, the most common way age factors into how much people eat is so that they can grow up at a good rate with the proper nutrition, something that applies to little kids first and foremost. Also, there are plenty of youngsters with pokemon that you fight, so the age limit on being a pokemon trainer thing doesn't apply here. If they don't give an age on a character and have them do immature stuff like cry when they lose, then for all intents and purposes, she's a little kid.
