[206 / 55 / ?]
Quoted By: >>33052514 >>33052532 >>33052565 >>33052632 >>33052643 >>33052663 >>33052678 >>33052754 >>33052801 >>33052877 >>33054048 >>33054087 >>33054101 >>33054527 >>33056527 >>33056592 >>33056834 >>33057733 >>33060642 >>33064044
I am not sure guys, you say digimon look terrible however I feel that isn't the case.
I don't know what pokemon fans deal with "naturalism" is,
>everything has to be found in nature
>where did they get those clothes
>oh that couldn't exist it's stupid
>too many spikes
>too edgy
>robots are stupid
These are MONSTERS, hence why they have MON in the name. Monsters can be robots, freaks, mutants, demons and amalgamations. They don't have to be exclusively stylized plants and animals....
>they are too human
Well, not every digimon can be recruited.
Some are outright enemies.
Also I have to say that in almost every case, when a digimon and pokemon are based off the same concept, the digimon almost always looks better in every case.
What are your sentiments on this /vp/ and why do pokemon fans hate pokemon and digimon with odd appearances.
I don't know what pokemon fans deal with "naturalism" is,
>everything has to be found in nature
>where did they get those clothes
>oh that couldn't exist it's stupid
>too many spikes
>too edgy
>robots are stupid
These are MONSTERS, hence why they have MON in the name. Monsters can be robots, freaks, mutants, demons and amalgamations. They don't have to be exclusively stylized plants and animals....
>they are too human
Well, not every digimon can be recruited.
Some are outright enemies.
Also I have to say that in almost every case, when a digimon and pokemon are based off the same concept, the digimon almost always looks better in every case.
What are your sentiments on this /vp/ and why do pokemon fans hate pokemon and digimon with odd appearances.