>>33071376 >>33069885Let's go down the list
>Pokemon won't actually make contact with eachother in battle like Pokemon Battle RevolutionAesthetic value. Understandable though.
>Pokemon are not scaled properlyMIGHT not be likely, but that depends on how they depict battles. Scale of the battleground was probably an issue of memory or the GPU.
>The game has no decent multiplayer that isn't just battling and tradingNovelty, not important to core game.
>Although it's a console game, there won't be multiple save files, forcing players with multiple people in the house that want to play at the same time to buy multiple SwitchesDebatable. Saves could just be linked to a My Nintendo Account since the Switch Carts can't store save data.
>Pokemon won't follow behind youNovelty choice, but given some entries, it's may be obvious why.
>There won't be a Battle FrontierMasuda can eat his words.
>It will be a linear story with heavy cutscenesThat's how they sell worldbuilding narratives for the anime and Special. They're not going to stop doing that.
>There won't be in-depth character customization more than changing clothesGF is too traditional for their own good, but I sympathize.
>There won't be any good minigamesNovelty.
>The graphics will just be Sun and Moon with a higher resolutionNot likely. Switch can handle lighting effects the 3DS can't, so seeing Pokemon with more complex shading engines (at least something like Ga-Olé or so probably won't be an unturned stone. Also, Sun/Moon's limitation was low resolution/downscaled texture sheets. Going on the Pokemon alone, it'll probably look more detailed than running S/M on Citra and that's because GameFreak has access to higher quality assets.
>There won't be consistent framerates I doubt that.
Switch isn'tthe most powerful tablet on market, but it can handle MUCH heavier polygon amounts than 3DS.
>No split-screen or same-console multiplayer like the Pokemon Stadium gamesNot important.
