>>33077446The poster you're responding to actually brought up empirical evidence to the incorrect, misleading, and moronic strains of logic projected by this show. The episode he made reference to attempts to brand video games as "gender neutral" due to the marketers choosing to target boys. But what the episode refuses to cover is if these marketers chose otherwise, video game history would've developed completely differently as the topics of said games would've been radically shifted.
They wouldn't of been games revolving around violence, raiding, adventure, or any other masculine focus. They would've mostly embodied more feminine aligned ones. The entire definition of "video game" would be different from reality. The episode bypasses this and tries to mold the viewer into thinking that the industry would be identical to what we have witnessed but just with a primary girl consumer base.
You are proving nothing but your own incapacity and/or laziness by saying that rightists accuse liberals of things often, and behaving as if this statement is some variation of a combatant or affirmative point. They legitimately do malicious courses of action often, and we provide ample evidence, but you and others like you refuse to listen.
