>>33165387>If that was the case then any anon would have carte blanche to take over any thread for any reason that has even a remote connection to the original subject.No? There's no comparison between a random anon doing a thread hijack and a consensus made by anons in a thread. You can't compare something established like Phox Phriday to a random one-off thread on /vp/, either. There's no slope to slip past "post foxes in Fox Friday" no matter how much someone like
>>33165418 wants to hyperbolize it. There's a large overlap between the fanbases of each fox Pokemon, I don't see why many people would have an issue with a combined Fox Friday. If anything it's worth trying to see if it makes these threads a bit less dead.
