>>332452963/4, i like all the mons independently, but somehow the combination on the page here is displeasing to me. maybe it's because all of these mons have a hard shell (if not exoskeleton), and so altogether they make for an un-cuddly bunch
>>332450573/4 top tier cuties followed by a terrible bubble bug that is neither cute nor top tier
>>332450433/4 the inclusion of wobbuffet immediately makes me assume you're an animefag
>>332450394/4 excellent choices, consistent colors and motiffs, pleasing visual composition and layout
>>332449872/4 i actually only like 1 out of those 4 pokemon, but the combination of them on the page makes me appreciate your apparent preference for pink mons with weird expressions
>>332449193/4 beautiful, classy mons, and a cockroach
>>332448214/4 edgy as fuck and yet i can't look away
>>332448094/4 chatot is actually awful, but cubone and houndoom each earn you an extra half-point so it balances out. what do you like about that bird?
>>332447753/4 i actually only genuinely like spheal and rhyhorn, but i gave you an extra point for pointing out an interesting pattern
>>332446574/4 but only because gliscor and pangoro got an honorable mention, otherwise 3/4
>>332446214/4 slowbro is perfection and the other guys are okay
