>>33268072Guy that you replied to that felt the need to respond after the non argument from the other guy, and I wasn't going to write a reply because this isn't really the board for this but whatever.
Basically
>even though it's 2D and not real, you will have no part of it and they want no part of it>young girls are heavily influenced by shit that you see in media which manifests in different ways>one of these new trends is all of this pro-lgbt messages in cartoons (yuri being part of it) and they're more likely to be affected>you see more girls becoming lesbians, especially in colleges they're everywhere, and they don't seem to grow out of it afterwards like they used to>the most die-hard supporters of this are straight/bicurious womenBasically this will one day cause a huge bubble where you are going to have a lot of single women without husbands/children or it just continues to grow to the point where they use sperm donors to breed and men literally will become worthless other than sperm. Gay men don't have this leverage with current technology at least. It can't even be defended as "it's not going to affect anything" when that is beyond the point where we are, it's more of the fact that this exists shows that the times have changed where for most men they will choose women, for women it's being pushed to be around 50/50 men and women. This is going to leave a fuck ton of men with no choice other than be alone, be gay, kill themselves or start an uprising, none of which are good. We'll be Japan-tier within a few generations.
>>33268284In theory yes but if the method is something that will fuck with the culture for at least a century later, then it isn't ideal, such as a nuclear war wouldn't be ideal. I differ from most /pol/acks in many ways (hell I don't even go there anymore) for example I don't think we just need to pump out kids to solve our problems, but keep a healthy consistent rate, but that will be impossible with the current situation.
