>>33463488>Posts picture of only Pokémon that is explicitly an item that got possessed >Claims that saying some Pokémon are inanimate objects is wrongDon't defend Richard, you're wrong automatically.
>>33463496Actually you said "No" and then proceeded to follow it up with implying I was referring to "some" Pokémon that can only be described as "Bannette"
I said some Pokémon are inanimate objects. The same way Psyduck is a Duck.