>>33688239pretty good, 9/10
>>33688426not bad but a grass though it has 3 4x grass weaknesses. also why scarf tenta and rain dance politoed.
>>33688736very well built but why have your signature be sawk if you don't have it for the no badge and 1 badge battles? still, great taste and build
>>33689515needs more type coverage, good otherwise.
>>33689961pretty well built and sneasel starting with 1 badge is a pretty good challlenge but steel cucks this team too much.
>>33690102pretty neat time but why get pyukumuku and qwilfish only to drop them later? interesting choice though. should add a grass or electric counter on the team though, you should have aquatic based animals that arent water type like elektross.
>>33690156pretty solid team, but nihilego should lead in the full team because toxic spikes, something else should be fully evolved in the 5 badges team, and rhyhorn should replace something in the first 2 teams so as to hit the player with a high bst pokemon for that point in the game. may also want rhyperior at 7 badges but thats just me. mostly solid but you should really have another counter for ground in there since that's your biggest weakness it seems. well built though.
>>33690160ill do later
>>33690177gotta say i like this, fighting and flying provide great challenge with hawlucha that early and boomburst chatot, though im not too amazed with the entire team being normal/flying. psychic is pretty good, ground is excellent, ghost while i think a-marowak is a great pick, litwick+duskull are huge setup bait. grass is very well built, fire can probably be swept once magcargo is down (if it has shell smash), and everything just gets destroyed by surf. electric gym has way too little variety in types, poison is pretty solid, i like the idea of having 2 different muk forms. steel is also quite nicely built, water needs another dual type but other than that its pretty good, normal is pretty cool, champ is a bit weird but you could make it work.
