>>33803839I like/hate a pokemon based on these things.
>DesignIf it's an objectmon it better be decent looking like Magnezone, Chimecho etc. things like Palossand are just dumb. Overdesigned garbage like USM box legend formes are also on "stay away from it list"
>Has the types i likeWhen i see a Ghost type i'll probably cringe due to the garbage designs that most Ghost types share, unless it's something special. When i see a Flying type i'm going to be neutral in the worst case unless it's called
Celesteela.
>Has moves i like or a fun to use movesetBrave Bird is cool and badass. Play Rough is just dumb, stupid and poorly defined. Things like Metronome, Copycat, Mirror Move are fun to use in normal playthroughs.
>FanbaseI like to use something overlooked that isn't very hated, basically a balance between overrated and underrated like the one in OP's pic which happens to be my alltime favorite. And not the same dickrided shillmon: Most of the Starters, Garchomp,Lucario,Greninja,Blaziken,Gardevoir, Gengar ,Mimikyu, Aegislash etc. And Pokemon that are unwelcome here: Goodra, Mienshao, Heliolisk etc.
Idiotic Fanbases like
Primarina's are also cancer.
>Game availabilityIrrelevant, how GameFreak made encounter rates shouldn't affect how much i like a certain pokemon.
>Competitive ViablityMostly irrelevant again. But it should be balanced, not a broken piece of shit and not an unsalvageable PU shitmon that can't even be used properly in-game due to garbage stats/abilities/movepool.
