Pulled out some hardcore autism on this. My only issue with it is that I think I made the Pokemon pool way too varied; not many normal types at all.
>>33811057Fire starter could definitely be better, but other than that it's pretty solid. Nice legendary choices.
>>33812064Lack of legends aside, this is best in thread. Congratulations. Early Chandelure and Walrein is great, not to mention Cradily and Salazzle.
>>33812566Decent legends, Okay starters, early Pokemon are iffy. I really like the mid-late game picks, though (Houndoom, Whimsicott, Noivern, etc)
>>33812797Good starters, decent legends, and great late game/pseudos. Banette, Honchkrow, and Mimikyu in a single game? Sign me up.
>>33813404Good starters and box legends, and earlymons are really strong (especially the Nincada line). Not really liking certain picks because they feel out of place (like Rotom and Golurk).
>>33813662Good starters, good legends, good bugs, and overall good taste. No complaints.
>>33814329The formatting is a mess, but some of your picks are pretty neat (especially all the dragons). Also Sawsbuck is great.
>>33815125This is probably the comfiest region I'd ever play. Good starters, and I really like the earlymons (especially Hawlucha and Furret).
>>33815317Great starters, overall decent legends, but I don't really like the water pokemon you put in.
>>33816135Starters a good, legends are flawless, and psychic kitties are top notch. Only qualm are the lacking earlymons.
>>33816143A bunch of awkward picks (Tynamo line, Slugma line, Gulpin line, etc) but I think it works out. Would play.
>>33816147Best starters in thread, and great pseudos. Also, neat autism, but I'm not feeling the Fairy champ.
