>>33819885Hey OP, next time maybe try including some actual text in your post? A lot of people's filters hide threads where the OP comment has nothing but a period or comma or whatever. If it wasn't for the fact that I happened to briefly unhide what my filter trapped, I never would have seen this thread.
Also:
>not using 4th anniversary artwork as the OP pictureIf you're the same anon who makes Amour threads at close to midnight when most of the Western world is asleep or going to sleep, you might consider letting someone else who knows what they're doing make these threads.
