>>33832906>nobody denied the Tapu or Ultra Beasts were LegendaryWell that's just factually incorrect. People still deny the UBs are POKEMON let alone legendary ones.
>Instead, there was no convincing evidence that they were, so it was simply unconfirmed as to whether or not they were.I think Bulbapedo and most sane rational people have very different definitions of "convincing evidence".
>they needed a marketing ad by the pokemon company to confirm something the actual fucking games made by the people who invented the concept of legendaries very clearly impliedThese are the same retards who maintain that Phione's Mythical status is "disputed". Why is Phione disputed but the Tapus and Silvally aren't? The evidence against both is "sources that identified certain Pokemon as legendary failed to to so for these Pokemon", so why does the source that confirms them as such settle the dispute for the latter but not the former? Just further proof that Bulbapedo is full of autists devoid of any capacity for rational thought or logical consistency.
