>>33872057Objectivity flies out the window when you start using subjective terms like 'bad' and 'superior', found both in your post and the page you posted as a citation. Just because something is found to be true for a majority does not make it ubiquitously true, nor does it make any layout objectively superior or inferior to others.
Objective statement: 'The majority of people will have more difficulty reading text on Serebii due to [insert research evidence here].'
Subjective statement: 'Serebii's layout is bad/inferior, and [insert evidence here] supports this opinion.'
The latter (which is the route you took with your post) is a serious misuse of research data, a misinterpretation of objectivity, and a poor way to argue. Objectively speaking.
