>>33965948>1. Most people like crisp clean graphicsWhich hasn't been a thing since ever when it comes to Pokémon, but yeah I suppose that is a reason on itself. I wonder how you stuck for so long.
>2. 30 too much to ask for?No, I was actually conceding it.
>3. Actually make a statement or ask a questionOP is the one who should explain what he means.
>4. Yeah they aren't chibi but the style and execution of the models are shit anywayThey're made in an ungodly amount of polys. If you want to nitpick on certain models, fine, say those specific models are shit. But if your issue is the animation, ffs that literally takes nothing to fix.
>but Pokemon's human characters always looked pretty shit.That's how it has always been. You could argue they could change it, but they won't. That's the art style of the whole series.
On that end what are your ideals?
>5. Guess they assume the came could be allot bigger with less memory and data restraints.We can only see what they do with so much space.
>6. No it doesn't have to happen on a Console like the Switch.It's not the console, it's the art style. I think they actually don't want to go for something like XD, hence why the scaling down. It's probably an usability and UX matter more than anything.
>7. Most likeley just excited to play a pokemon train in battle game again since Gale of Darkness.I know OP meant this, but it's rather dumb to demand Pokémon to be on TV since it has never happened in mainline games. We're getting them anyways.
>You're pretty anal and contrarian about this.OP is the anal one.
I am glad we're getting a decent upgrade, but bashing previous games based on irrealistic metrics about stuff it has never aimed to do is just unfair.
