/vp/ - Pokémon » Thread #34087326

[14 / 2 / ?]

19KiB, 250x208, latios_latias.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Thu 09 Nov 2017 10:11:43 No.34087326 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>34087358 >>34087361 >>34087371 >>34087391 >>34087445 >>34087836

Does anyone else miss roaming pokemon?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 09 Nov 2017 10:13:55 No.34087340 Report

Quoted By: >>34087349 >>34088000 >>34088146

Not exactly, but I do miss the feeling of putting some effort in to catch a legendary. I prefer them being hidden within a twisty dungeon, myself.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 09 Nov 2017 10:15:27 No.34087349 Report

Quoted By: >>34088000

>>34087340
Seconding this. Roaming legendaries were a major pain, but stationary ones at the end of a dungeon were cool.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 09 Nov 2017 10:16:57 No.34087358 Report

Quoted By:

>>34087326
No, roaming Pokemon are the fucking worst.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 09 Nov 2017 10:17:15 No.34087361 Report

Quoted By: >>34088146

>>34087326
No, they were fucking awful. Though I’m not against the idea per se but the execution was bad.

I’d prefer something like Suicune where it’s an overworld encounter you have to search out, then it moves off to another location. After a few times you can battle it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 09 Nov 2017 10:19:34 No.34087371 Report

Quoted By:

>>34087326
It should be made like Suicune in HG/SS and crystal, where you follow it around the world until you get a battle where it doesn't flee

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 09 Nov 2017 10:22:56 No.34087391 Report

Quoted By:

>>34087326
No, the only good roamers were Suicune and XY's birds.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1509707145472.jpg, 72KiB, 1024x1024

Anonymous Thu 09 Nov 2017 10:30:14 No.34087445 Report

Quoted By:

>>34087326
>roaming pokemon
>miss

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 09 Nov 2017 11:27:34 No.34087836 Report

Quoted By: >>34087880

>>34087326
No, roamers were a cancerous shitfest where you get shoehorned into using very specific pokemon or getting very lucky because fuck you that's why. Not even talking about how they can bug out in specific cases and deny you a catch for entire playthrough.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 09 Nov 2017 11:33:09 No.34087880 Report

Quoted By: >>34088077 >>34088146

>>34087836
>keep walking in between 2 routes
>check the map between switches
>fight it until caught
Takes like 10 minutes per roaming pokemon.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 09 Nov 2017 11:51:26 No.34088000 Report

Quoted By:

Hell no, but
>>34087340
>>34087349
I agree

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 09 Nov 2017 11:56:00 No.34088031 Report

Quoted By:

The only problem with roaming Pokemon is getting that first encounter so you can start tracking them and having to constantly open your Pokedex to find them. Gen 4 fixed this but it was a huge issue in gen 2 and 3. Retards will say "just switch between routes, it werks for me xd" but it's still down to sheer luck. I've spent 10 hours in GSC trying to hunt down the legendary beasts and I've only found Suicune. And I haven't been much luckier in previous playthroughs either. Pokemon shouldn't be locked behind a ridiculous roll of the dice.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 09 Nov 2017 12:02:25 No.34088077 Report

Quoted By:

>>34087880
Too hard for tards

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 09 Nov 2017 12:14:03 No.34088146 Report

Quoted By:

>>34087880
While this is true, it kind of defeats the point of roamers. I agree with >>34087361 and >>34087340

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches