>>34301052>like activation treats codThat's completely wrong though, if that were the case we'd be getting a new game every year made with multiple studios.
Gamefreak has the power to say "no" to Nintendo if they don't agree with what their plan is for Pokemon. If Pokemon gets a negative reception because of a rushed game then that's a hit Nintendo doesn't want to take, especially after there's been a surge of popularity in the past few years because of GO/SM reaching out to a wider audience and getting them back interested in Pokemon. It needs to be a definitive game for the series that lasts at least 3 years since its now a console game and not a 3DS game, with the Switch Gen I don't see bi-yearly releases, each game will probably have to survive for 2.5-3 years because of the fact that Switch games are essentially double the cost of a 3DS game meaning less people will buy 3rd versions/remakes.
