>>34346624it didn't start looking like a dragon until the OP posted the garchomp-lite evolution, which looks nothing like charmeleon for one
>inevitable flying secondary typedid charmander look like it would have an inevitable flying typing added on, based on charmander's design alone?
charmander didn't even look like a dragon type
you sound like one of those people that used to post about how all of sage's pokemon were carbon copies of existing Pokemon based on typing alone
that manta ray doesn't even have similar eyes to charmander
you're really readching with that one
