/vp/ - Pokémon » Thread #34381664

[54 / 9 / ?]

81KiB, 1024x476, Rjpalmer_tyrannosaurusrex_white_background-1024x476.jpg

Anonymous Wed 06 Dec 2017 01:25:08 No.34381664 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>34381695 >>34381711 >>34384875 >>34387626 >>34387739 >>34388585 >>34389580 >>34389899 >>34391287 >>34392062 >>34392513

Tyrantrum's Ultra Sun PokeDex entry:
>Complete restoration is impossible, allowing room for theories that its entire body was once covered in a feather-like coat.
Scaliefags BTFO

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Tyrannosaur_skin_impressions-lite.jpg, 2MiB, 2000x1125

Anonymous Wed 06 Dec 2017 01:28:47 No.34381695 Report

Quoted By: >>34389580 >>34389588

>>34381664
>all these big Tyrannosaur skin impression not a single follicle to be found

hmmm...

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 Dec 2017 01:30:10 No.34381711 Report

Quoted By: >>34384546 >>34384551

>>34381664
Do you understand the meaning of the word, 'theories'?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Jurassic Park reboot.webm, 2MiB, 720x1080

Anonymous Wed 06 Dec 2017 01:33:11 No.34381746 Report

Quoted By: >>34388392 >>34389676 >>34391947 >>34392566

we wuz dinasars an shiet

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 Dec 2017 09:13:59 No.34384546 Report

Quoted By:

>>34381711
Ah, yes, like the famous yet to be provenienti theory of gravity and theory of Evolution.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 Dec 2017 09:15:11 No.34384551 Report

Quoted By: >>34385752

>>34381711
Ah, yes, like the famous yet to be proven theory of gravity and theory of evolution.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 Dec 2017 11:05:47 No.34384875 Report

Quoted By:

>>34381664
so how many incomplete fossils were restored to result in genetically mutated blobs?

wait fuck is that what muk is??

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 Dec 2017 14:55:01 No.34385752 Report

Quoted By: >>34387726

>>34384551
You mean the law of universal gravitation?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 Dec 2017 19:57:44 No.34387626 Report

Quoted By: >>34392599

>>34381664
havent we had this thread before? most of the fossilmons probably had different forms back when they were alive. i say most, because in some cases theyve been proven to look exactly the same in prehistoric times as they do after restoration

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 Dec 2017 20:16:14 No.34387726 Report

Quoted By: >>34389322 >>34389341

>>34385752
You do know that physical laws are theoretical, right?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 Dec 2017 20:18:02 No.34387739 Report

Quoted By: >>34387753

>>34381664
>tfw the artist of that pic has all but admitted to being wrong after new skin impressions were found
HOW WILL FEATHERFAGS EVER RECOVER?!?!

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 Dec 2017 20:19:20 No.34387753 Report

Quoted By: >>34388804

>>34387739
we don’t need to because we’re right
tyrantrum had feathers lole

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO dooawc6stqgz.jpg, 49KiB, 571x739

Anonymous Wed 06 Dec 2017 21:54:49 No.34388392 Report

Quoted By:

>>34381746

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 Dec 2017 22:15:35 No.34388585 Report

Quoted By: >>34389707

>>34381664
So... original Tyrantrum is Flying/Dragon type?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 Dec 2017 22:43:49 No.34388804 Report

Quoted By:

>>34387753
>got the fictional creature right instead of the real one

SCALEFAGS BTFO

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 Dec 2017 23:53:25 No.34389322 Report

Quoted By: >>34390250

>>34387726
No, they aren't. Laws are statements of observed physical constants. Theories are explanations based on observations and experimental results.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 Dec 2017 23:55:33 No.34389341 Report

Quoted By:

>>34387726
>this again
The theory is about how the physical law works, not that it exists.

We fucking know it exists. If you think otherwise, you might have a problem, anon.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Dec 2017 00:29:57 No.34389580 Report

Quoted By: >>34389707 >>34389925 >>34391487 >>34392794

>>34381664
>mega tyrantrum gets extravagant feathers and becomes flying type
>>34381695
>misrepresenting a study
Dumbass.
https://youtu.be/CxE68c9rYa0
Iirc it’s been confirmed it definitely did not have lips though.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Dec 2017 00:31:09 No.34389588 Report

Quoted By: >>34392794 >>34392861

>>34381695
>half of those from different genuses let alone species
Why the fuck is it being put on a T. rex?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Dec 2017 00:34:52 No.34389614 Report

Quoted By: >>34389707 >>34392614 >>34393295

>all these assholes suggesting ttrum becomes flying/dragon

>losing stab head smash

Why

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Dec 2017 00:42:51 No.34389676 Report

Quoted By:

>>34381746
Go, I say go away boy, you bother me

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Dec 2017 00:46:49 No.34389707 Report

Quoted By: >>34391967 >>34392542

>>34388585
>>34389614
>>34389580
>all birds can fly
>having feathers makes you a bird
>>>>

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Dec 2017 01:14:16 No.34389899 Report

Quoted By:

>>34381664
This shit reminder me the Exeggutor R/S entry

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Dec 2017 01:18:55 No.34389925 Report

Quoted By:

>>34389580
>not a single folllicle

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Dec 2017 02:01:58 No.34390250 Report

Quoted By: >>34391516 >>34392026

>>34389322
>being this wrong
Physical laws are absolutely explanations based on observations and experimental results too.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Dec 2017 04:01:03 No.34391287 Report

Quoted By:

>>34381664
But it has a beard

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Dec 2017 04:29:55 No.34391487 Report

Quoted By:

>>34389580
>Trey the Complainer
That retard literally for some David Peters bullshit, lmao.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Dec 2017 04:34:35 No.34391516 Report

Quoted By: >>34394003

>>34390250
Nope, they're just statements. Like for example, the law of universal gravitation simply states that objects that have mass will seemingly experience a force of attraction proportional to their masses and inversely proportional to their distance with no explanation given of why that happens. Other laws, for example, the laws of motion, similarly carry no explanation.
>b-but the law of universal gravitation explains planetary movement
No it doesn't. The theory of planetary movement explains planetary movement. It makes use of the law of universal gravitation to do it, so you can say that it's part of the explanation, but it isn't the explanation. It is a simple statement of observable scientific fact that you can reduce to a mathematical formula.
g=G*m1*m2/(r^2)

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Dec 2017 05:45:39 No.34391947 Report

Quoted By:

>>34381746
Have we reached maximum fluff yet?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Dec 2017 05:48:56 No.34391967 Report

Quoted By:

>>34389707
>>having feathers makes you a bird
Yes.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Dec 2017 05:57:32 No.34392026 Report

Quoted By: >>34394003

>>34390250
Youre not right, time to do more than high school level sciences

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Dec 2017 06:00:19 No.34392041 Report

Quoted By:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yoqHbD-Wo9I

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1512623765444.webm, 2MiB, 716x478

Anonymous Thu 07 Dec 2017 06:04:42 No.34392062 Report

Quoted By: >>34392471

>>34381664
>some small tyrannosaurid 30 million years before t.rex was fully covered with feathers
>t. rex was fully covered too! I swear!!

australopithecines like lucy were about as hairy as a chimp, yet most humans don't look like jesús aceves

feather cultists (and their pupils, the "t.rex had lips" crowd) are almost as bad as pokémon hax

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Dec 2017 07:20:25 No.34392471 Report

Quoted By: >>34392606

>>34392062
>"feather cultists"
I hope you realize how autistic you sound

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Dec 2017 07:29:27 No.34392513 Report

Quoted By: >>34392700

>>34381664
>Yutyrannus is discovered
"LOL all Tyrannosaurs had feathers"
>Find tail scales
"Oh ok naked tail but the rest of it was feathered!"
>Find neck scales and toe skin
"Well T.rex probably had a dinky "cape" of feathers on its back"

how many times do featherfags gotta be btfo?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Dec 2017 07:37:38 No.34392542 Report

Quoted By:

>>34389707
>Dodrio

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1510178758960.jpg, 105KiB, 500x1340

Anonymous Thu 07 Dec 2017 07:45:22 No.34392566 Report

Quoted By:

>>34381746
That's a big bird

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Dec 2017 07:54:29 No.34392599 Report

Quoted By:

>>34387626
this, Its even stated somewhere that mega aerodactyl's look is closer to what it actually looked like millions of years ago instead of the restored version we got.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Dec 2017 07:56:09 No.34392606 Report

Quoted By: >>34392911

>>34392471
Not as autistic as people like you who fall for cheap media sensationalism instead of reading actual science articles.

His points are all valid.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Dec 2017 07:58:42 No.34392614 Report

Quoted By:

>>34389614
>implying it can’t gain a crest ability that’s basically intimidate on steroids

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 20102_697-0.png, 59KiB, 300x300

Anonymous Thu 07 Dec 2017 08:00:27 No.34392622 Report

Quoted By: >>34392936 >>34392972

So she could have been a cute birb at some point?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Dec 2017 08:24:11 No.34392700 Report

Quoted By:

>>34392513
I think it's likely that it looked like an elephant, with small and thin hair like feathers that are unlikely to get fossilized.
It makes little sense for a big animal in a warm climate to have a thick fur coat.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Tyrant skin Witton 2017.jpg, 106KiB, 1600x729

Anonymous Thu 07 Dec 2017 08:51:16 No.34392794 Report

Quoted By: >>34392946

>>34389580
>STILL referring to Trey's seething kneejerk video as if it helps your case whatsoever

Anon please. It's time to move on.

>>34389588
They're all tyrannosaurs, more or less closely related. The fact that impressions and correlations of scales only has been found on them gives us a hint on how they appeared in real life.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Dec 2017 09:04:49 No.34392861 Report

Quoted By:

>>34389588
Tarbosaurus is potentially a synonym of Tyrannosaurus.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Dec 2017 09:16:09 No.34392911 Report

Quoted By:

>>34392606
He's right is completely silly going into average over this shit.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Dec 2017 09:21:25 No.34392936 Report

Quoted By:

>>34392622
Usually I don't reply to shitposts but..
>She

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Dec 2017 09:23:52 No.34392946 Report

Quoted By:

>>34392794
True but the difference between a cockatiel and a galah, despite being the same genus, is enormous. It’s entirely feasible that some species had more feathers in different places than others.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 4FAD492B-85AB-4D75-8BC9-A93E907D (...).jpg, 130KiB, 1282x773

Anonymous Thu 07 Dec 2017 09:26:22 No.34392972 Report

Quoted By:

>>34392622
>ultra tyrantrum is pic related
11/10 instantly my favorite Pokemon of all time.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Dec 2017 10:29:16 No.34393295 Report

Quoted By: >>34393310 >>34393885

>>34389614
It’s generally assumed/implied that all fossilmon are rock type due to being revivified fossils, with their original typing being possibly something else.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Dec 2017 10:32:17 No.34393310 Report

Quoted By:

>>34393295
It's canon that Mega Aerodactyl is the true Aerodactyl and that Aerodactyl was restored wrong because they took away too much rock. If anything the fossils are going to be getting rockier.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Dec 2017 12:45:55 No.34393885 Report

Quoted By:

>>34393295
Fan assumptions are often wrong. Mega-Aero seems to imply that they got fossilised BECAUSE they were rock types, if anything

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Dec 2017 12:50:35 No.34393907 Report

Quoted By:

Tyrannosaurs weren't covered in just feathers. They were covered in feces too.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Dec 2017 13:12:55 No.34394003 Report

Quoted By: >>34394236

>>34391516
>implying equations can't be theoretic.
Physical laws are interpretations of observations. They're theoretical, they aren't "facts" and have over the years been frequently altered due to them, well, not being completely accurate.
>>34392026
Reminder that you're on the side trying to equate theories with hypotheses.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Dec 2017 14:09:35 No.34394236 Report

Quoted By:

>>34394003
It’s funny because the idea of gravity being a force, which is what I assume anon was talking about when they said the theory of gravity, has been largely replaced by it being an effect of mass curving space-time as detailed by the theory of special relativity.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches