>>34401412>>34398638Not a fan of spec attackers? Just seems like you'd get walled easily. Maybe mix the attack style up.
>>34399914I get a really techno vibe from this that's lots of fun to play around with. Shame it comes with 2 UBs, as you say, but I'm still into it.
>>34399963The roach seems outta place with the other relatively muscle-bound beasts, but otherwise a cool "macho" selection. Overall, it's pretty decent.
>>34400067In game teams using old mons brings out my inner "reeeeee". I dunno why everyone is suddenly so interested in Malamar, but I'm to see my mate getting some love. At least you had the decency to commit to a monotype.
>>34400186Two shinies is pushing it, but at least the first one looks awesome. Otherwise, it seems very "late gen" heavy, and the types are overlapping a fair bit. Needs improvement.
>>34400234Pivot-Wall, the experience. I love them all individually, but together they make me wanna unplug the router. Great choices.
>>34400262I'm not into OU, so gunna have to disapprove, but at least you've chosen the best possible mega of the bunch. Decent taste.
>>34400299Seems like you've made it easy on yourself to beat the game. I'm not into that, but whatever brings you joy. Hope you like using them at least.
>>34400736Lesser seen mons, tick. The double ground typing rustles my jimmies, but the mon choices are otherwise fantastic.
>>34400858Couldn't get into NFE myself (except Magneton), but i'm jealous of you. Opens up your team options by a huge amount. Team variance is even more embarrassing as a result of that though.
>>34400876You've committed to the idea of what a pokemon team should ideally represent, and make excellent choices after that. Clearly one of the better trainers on this board.
>>34400892Pretty cancerous desu. Definitely wouldn't be friends in real life.
>>34400969Another "late gen" heavy team, with a strange weighting on dark type? Seems confused and insincere. Do some soul searching and try again.
