>>34509383I love Snorlax. I'd say that your team very closely represents what normal types are all about. However, I'll say that by not including a Normal/Flying type you're not completely representing it perfect.y.
>>34511724I love Volcarona. I think that you've really nailed what bugs are all about. However considering you have only one 3-stage evolutionary Pokémon, you have not represented but type to the fullest.
>>34511751I love Froslass and Weavile is my 3rd favorite Pokémon overall. I think you represent Ice types incredibly well, and any criticism I would have would be just a nitpick.
>>34511754Again, Volcarona is great. I think you do a slightly worse job representing bug types than
>>34511724 , because while your teams are very similar you not only fell into the pitfall they did, I don't think you're properly representing their usual cuteness or their beauty.
>>34512407Weavile is just he best, and Spiritomb is great too. Dark is probably the most complicated type to nail down in terms of what they really represent. I think you did a great job, and I think that any criticisms I would have would be nitpicks.
>>34512449None of these Pokémon speak to me. I will say that there's a very thin line between what defines Rocks and Ground types because there's so much overlap. I would say that you pretty much cover everything ground types have to offer, but I think there are too many defensively oriented Pokémon and not enough that use the earth or the underground to their advantage.
>>34512599Gyarados is great. I have to give my compliments, because water is a really ubiquitous and diverse type. You did a great job, but I will say that there's not enough deep-sea representation here.
>>34512616I love Drifblim. Obviously you made a theme out of a type making your job even harder than normal. Kudos and great
I will rate the rest in the next post. Comment too long.
