[70 / 5 / ?]
>Bulbapedia is against using the term "Sublegend" or acknowledging Type: Null as a Legendary Pokemon because they feel it's not 100% official
>perfectly fine with using terms like "Legendary beasts," "eon duo," and "trio master" and putting them at the top of a Pokemon's article despite admitting they are fanon
???
>perfectly fine with using terms like "Legendary beasts," "eon duo," and "trio master" and putting them at the top of a Pokemon's article despite admitting they are fanon
???