>>34713417>>34714304No, naw, he's right, Anon.
I sort of understand where you're coming from, but these Anons are more correct:
>>34713421 ,
>>34713284 ,
Lycanroc isn't a poorly designed pokemon, nessicarily, they're just a poorly designed Rock-type Pokemon. You need to remember that Lycanroc isn't HALF Rock-Type, they're PURE Rock-Type and they don't look like it at all: their rock spikes don't read as 'rocks' and, I mean, fucking look at midnight form Lycanroc.
You only think it's obvious because you possess meta-knowledge of the game.
>>34714086>>34716503That's a really good counter point, but Fossil Pokemon get a pass on the basis of thematic typing and a little less on physical or obvious tells.
By that I mean Fossil Pokemon follow the: Stone Age, Rock, Fossil, Rock, Dinosaur, kind of deal where their typing is more subtly to do with their ancient origins n' so forth. A lot of people also argue that their 'rock' typing might be a process of reanimating them from fossil, but that's another discussion all together.
>>34716956>What animal and element is this?Rabbit or Badger, Dinosaur/Kaiju, and Ground and or 'maybe' Poison.
It's difficult to be impartial, obviously, but you can tell from it's squat posture and claws that it could be a burrowing creature to some degree possibly classifying it as a Ground-Type and the spikes and colouring hint at some Venom or Toxicity.
