>>34788340Depends. General reaction is to ignore. Only I have to be happy with what I'm doing, assuming no one else is being physically hurt without their reasonable consent in the process.
If they make some kind of points I'll debunk it and finish with letting them know my contempt for their single digit IQ but ignore is generally what happens.
>>34788354Unfortunately, no. There are a LOT of physical adults who haven't mentally made the transition.
I've had to quote C.S. Lewis far more times than I'd care to as part of debunking their bullshit.
They're often conservative which is really no surprise considering being conservative at this point is mostly about fun killing, about thinking people shouldn't act outside of the ways you find acceptable even when it has nothing to do with you.
>>34788367No, you should be playing them wherever you wish. Remind me to never touch your controllers since you seem to be confusing it with masturbation and I can only think of one reason that'd be true.
>>34788573Which is actually weird. Especially if it's a work of fiction you're reading, what makes that any different? Nothing except the time that form of entertainment has existed is what.
>>34788587What the fuck do you think a hobby is, dipshit?
Anything is a hobby if you don't need to be doing it.
>>34788992>I'm trying to show you idiots how easy it is to pick up real hobbiesSo when you pick one up, you think you're hallucinating? Video games exist, they are real and as much a hobby as anything else, especially as it relates to fiction. If video games aren't okay then neither is reading, or movies, or theater, or music, etc. because they're also about taking you away from reality.
You're the retard here, not everyone else I'm afraid.
