>>34796534That's so naive and superficial in every aspect of society prejudice problems. It's like saying that things don't have implicit meanings. I do not agree with OP but you can't deny that things MAYBE, read this: MAYBE, can have implicit stuff. Black and asian people being connected with monkeys, LGBTQ+ connected with HIV, black people connected with stealing, blond girls connected to being stupid, latinos connected to being robbers, etc. The deal isn't about pretending that some concepts aren't inside people's mind, is about discussing what's in people's mind and how to vanish this relation and why. There's a difference between spoting prejudice and accepting prejudice, OP is pointing what it think that is implicit joke-form prejudice, not that it think it's OK making jokes about slavery.
Again, I don't think that this specific trainer has implicit slavery joke, but your point is completely immature.
