>>35270008by rows, the max number of 2s is 12. by columns, 9. that means not all viable rows can be 2. if 3 rows are 2 that means the fourth row has a single 2 which brings the total of 2s to 10 which is still too much.
2 rows will work. it means total 2s are 8. (and 2 3s)
1 row will also work and there will be 6 2s. (and 3 3s)
now regarding the columms.. the purple column contribute a 3 no matter what. it might contribute another but one for sure.
case 1: there are 3 3s total (and 6 2s)
so either the purple, yellow or red column will have the 3less option (in the purple cas it means it only contributed 1 3)
purple has only one 3, the others got the 3 options: number of 2s on columns is 1+ 0 +0 +1 +3 = 5 != 6
yellow got the 2: number of 2s in columns is 1+0+2+1+1 !=5
red got the 2: number of 2s is 3+0+0+1+1=5 !=6
this doesn't work.
case 2: there are 2 3s total. (and 8 2s)
purple column give a single 3. which give an additional 3 and have the rest with only 2?
purple: number of 2s in columns is than 3+0+2+1+1=7 != 8
yellow: 3+0+0+1+3= 7 != 8
red: 1+0+0+2+1+3=7 !=8
CONCLUSIONS
this screenshot is fake.
real conclusion:
case 3
4 rows are 321
there are only 4 2s
there are 4 3s
ANOTHER STEP HAS BEEN TAKEN
