>>35338343I disagree. The exaggerated expressions, bright contrasting colors, and nonsensical text definitely make it alternative. It's just not executed in the best possible way.
Just look at the shading, for example. Whoever made it clearly has their own unique style and the potential to make good art. But it would look a lot more impressive if they used better software, or at least their current one more effectively. The strokes are too pixelated where they could look more natural. They could have written the words by hand rather than type it in, so that it's less MS Paint-tier. But maybe they typed it because they only had a mouse to draw with, and the strokes look that way because they didn't have great brushes available to them (though it looks to me like they only needed to work on a bigger canvas). Or maybe they just made it shitty on purpose. Who knows.
Point is, it's not bad at all, and I personally kinda dig it. In fact, I'm only posting this because reverse image searching brought up nothing and I want a source :l Anyways, autism over. Have a wonderful weekend, /ef/.
