>>35410441>None of what he said falls under any "fallacy" that your crackpot brain could hope to shell out because you know every last bit of it is true.True or not, that doesn't matter. What matters is that it is still fallacy, and therefore, he failed, especially when again, I apologize for what I and others have made on this thread. You and I and he and everybody doesn't like it when someone makes a distorted awful version of you with pulled lies, and then share this same version to everyone else.
If you think fallacies are not fallacies when you want to believe in them, then I don't know anymore what in the world is a "fallacy".
>even made a point that you haven't had a thread in who knows or cares how longExactly, and that's why a portion of unexpected discussion has come across to this thread, because Dusknoir has never had a thread for himself as far as I can remember. Sure, it was unwanted, I admit, but given that Dusknoir, again, never had a thread, nobody can really be blamed for what has happened to this thread. Now that this has passed, this will never happen again for certain.
Also, it's a Dusknoir thread, not a thread about me.
>yet you couldn't help to cry foul when someone draws attention to it.I didn't bash or namecall OP when he mentioned that. In fact, it seems like the one who's really calling attention to all of that is you so far.
>You also act as though the difference between rampant unwanted lewd discussion and fetish conversations don't fall into the same boatThat's right, because lewdness and fetishes don't have the same definition. For one thing, it's not what I had in mind, but this thread itself has proven that that normal discussion and talk-sex of a same Pokémon can coexist, with one doesn't tackle the other, and vice-versa.
>Your couldn't be more defensive about your situation if you tried.Again, there's no need to be this much of mad, enough to mistype "You".