>>35355663It's the corrupt janitors that we have. They only allow things they think it's hot, and delete theses that they don't like. In other words, double-standards. I'm aware allowing all lewd and smut threads in /vp/ in the first place is bad, but it's less bad at least than clearly remove threads you don't like instead doing your job.
>>35355798>>35355833>But then again, I've seen more husbando/bara threads devolve into blatant furry clusterfucks>That's because of falseflaggersIs that why? It sounds
and sucks that they accidentally derails into the extreme furry territory sometimes before, but still, if the waifu threads are allowed, then I still can't see why shouldn't bara/husbando threads be allowed too here.
