>>35454714Yeah, it's like the boring number paradox, where there's a group of numbers without interesting properties that makes them boring, so you end up separating all the numbers into interesting and boring groups.
However, by doing this, the smallest boring number suddenly becomes interesting by its definition and it's no longer boring.
The same thing goes for the second smallest number, which is now the smallest number, then the third smallest and so on.
Finally you end up with just one number that has the very interesting quality of being the only boring number in existence, and suddenly you no longer have any boring numbers.