>>35551992Usually when leaks build up on other leaks, the build up on leaks that has been posted BEFORE the one they want to post
But here it's litterally the opposite, Pixelpart did the fucking drawing, then Emily posted here rumor, and AFTER that, Pixelpar posted a video that was uploaded roughly 2 weeks ago, to explain the meaning behind those drawing. And guess what, it ""predicts"" exactly what she said
At least if you're saying they have no correlation, I'd ask you to tell me how so
https://twitter.com/pixelpar/status/996378665482153984It's the fact that those person, that don't seem to interact with each other, manage to give us the EXACT same "fake" leak
>It was easy to predict.He got the exact dates for both, the odds are to big for that to be a lucky shot
Plus, Nintendo litterally announced that they would drop the VC stuff, and instead would just let the people who pay for online play NES games
We're talking about a unconfirmed leak, of course we can't prove it true until we have a little something from TPCi themself. But again, there's just too much "coincidence" here, and contrary to other leaks, they don't make sense timewise. You can't possibly build up your fake leak on a fake leak that will be released by someone else one month later. That would demand way too much plannification for two days of internet fame. That would be stupid
