[27 / 6 / ?]
Quoted By: >>35562859
How is this """leak""" any more valid than any of the other leaks we've been getting?
>MUH APRIL 1ST LEAK
Yes, of course. These two unproven leaks have are similar therefore they must both be correct.
>MUH LAPRAS SCREENSHOT
See above.
>MUH DOMAIN NAME
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cybersquatting
>MUH MASUDA TWEET
Yeah, it's not like the faker could have based his logo on that tweet or anything.
>MUH APRIL 1ST LEAK
Yes, of course. These two unproven leaks have are similar therefore they must both be correct.
>MUH LAPRAS SCREENSHOT
See above.
>MUH DOMAIN NAME
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cybersquatting
>MUH MASUDA TWEET
Yeah, it's not like the faker could have based his logo on that tweet or anything.