>>35616614What the fuck are you talking about? I said Japan calls it the shell pokemon and said that both "Shell Pokémon" and the errenous translation "Shellfish Pokémon" can both be related to the fact that it's cannons are based off of the tubes found in shellfish.
>you assume it's "oh they're those shelled sea creatures" What are you talking about?
>For regulatory purposes it is often narrowly defined as filter-feeding molluscsThose include the molluscs that Blastoise's cannons are based off. Nobody is claiming Blastoise IS a shellfish. Nobody is claiming "Shellfish Pokémon" is more accurate than "Shell Pokémon"
>The closest thing they look like are nudibranch stalksI personally don't see the comparison, but nudibranch are molluscs so I'm not sure what you're saying. Shellfish is a reference to the cannons but not in the way I suggested?
>Cool names without thoughtHave nothing to do with what I said
>The tongue isn't a component of the final evoWhat? I presume you just phrased that badly
>You are the same fagsAnd now we get into seething projection, I don't even know what the fuck "Electrode is a mimic!" means.
I can make shit up too, you are the same fags who say that dogs can't look up.
>if you designed Pancham's evo, you'd be soley focused on his leafNo, that would be the one insisting that the bubbles stay and get bigger. I'm defending an evo LOSING similarity to it's prevo. Pancham loses it's leaf for more prominent and appropriate design features, the same as Greninja having less bubbles for a tongue that's a more direct reference to it's inspiration.
