>>35648279It doesn't matter, they both get huge amounts of shit wrong, it's just that most people don't remember it, or they're so vague that when it doesn't amount to anything they say 'Well I did say maybe!'.
Look at Emily's response, first she says 'It will be an RPG with two versions' (WOW REALLY?) then she gets asked "Is there going to be Pokémon GO integration?" (Which Masuda already said he wanted to do) to which she answers "WELL THE BETTER QUESTION IS HOW CAN POKÉMON GO HELP THE GAME FRANCHISE" and starts talking about GO's financial figures. That's not a fucking leak, if she knew the answer to the question she'd be able to factually answer like "Yes it will, and it'll work like this ________” or even just "It definitely will, I don't know the specifics on how, but it will definitely do _______".
But no, instead she throws up a bunch of rhetorical garbage that is literally no different from saying "What do you think?". She clearly doesn't actually know anything solid (if anything at all), just like PixelPal she gives non-answers and leaves 'hints' so when it all turns out to be shit they can say "Well I only hinted to what it might have! This doesn't count as me being wrong!".
