>>36169306>no one called rape victims slutsNever i said this, indeed i was talking about the link looking slut and rape, as like if you wear in a way you will be called slut 'cause you're stupid and can be raped. Because then using the whole argument of "raping" is useless if this is not your point.
>Dressing skimpy makes you LOOK SLUTTYThe problem is that it's still offensive, and it's similar, even people just call the girl "slut" and not "looking like a slut". Looking Slutty is like saying a dude that he looks like a nerd even if he is not, but maybe he like dressing in some way that you think he is that, by some stupid stereotypes.
>but you cannot deny that some people put themselves in a position of vulnerability and negligenceI'm not denying that, since i said someone can conscious wear something like that and doing it because he/she doesn't accept to be limitated. It's not something so bad, since it's not directly caused by her/his and it would neither be prosecuted legally by her action. I know that you can say that could have been avodable (not really about the dress but more like about bringing a friend), but at this point you have to live in your house forever and just got out for job (or working by home) so you can avoid the most of the problems caused by the others.
>Stop being close-mindedI can say the same to you since you are still going against me. And how can you call me "close minded" if you say that someone could have some "self-responsabile" of things caused by other?
>You shouldn't assume the world won't do any harm to you, and that everyone around you accepts your privacy and wishes.I'm not saying that. I'm just saying who is legally right and who is not, and the law in the nation is the meaning of "objectively right" and since in the most important nation in this world doesn't talk about shits like "self-responsabilities" in those cases. In a logical way, using "self-responsabilities" is unfair for the victim.
