>>36254825I'm objectively, factually correct. I even gave you the exact time in the trailer that shows Pokémon-specific, damage-specific attack animations are still in the game, which is exactly what posters of the webm are trying to claim is missing from the games.
Of course, then ya'll move the goalpost and say things like "but what about more move-specific animations!" even though it is not feasible in the slightest to give every single Pokémon literally hundreds of unique animations, and when BTFO on that, you'll move the goalpost further to saying "i-it's not just animations, we're upset about lots of things in the game" like
>>36254770 did.
And of course if attempting to argue about other things, you'll only be BTFO further, because the vitriol spewn at this game is mostly baseless.
