When you put an Eeveelution in your top 5 you know something is wrong with that Gen.
>>36272194Gen 1 cool, easy 5\5
Gen 2 they look like bland choices, but you picked the coolest "popular" mons, 4\5 (Celebi and Typhlosion get .5 each)
Gen 3 Kyogre is not great, but interesting choices, 3.5\5 (Crawdaunt is meh)
Gen 4 mostly good, not a fan of Froslass and Toxicroak, 3\5
Gen 5 another easy one, 4.5\5 (Conkeldurr doesn't get full point)
Gen 6 not bad, your top 2 is a bit weak, 3.5\5
Gen 7 come on, there are some cool designs (still 3\3)
overall great taste
>>36272916Gen 1 a bit messy 6.5\10
Gen 2 Steelix and Slowking are some of the worst designs of their gen, 5.5\10
Gen 3 some odd choices but not inherently bad, 7\10
Gen 4 I got some issues with Gen 4, it's hard to find those I like, 5\10
Gen 5 Gothita and Stunfisk are a no-no, but it's nice someone likes them, 6.5\10
Gen 6 4\5 Carbink is awful
Gen 7 just bad, only 2 are good, 2 just ok, rest is bad, 3\7
Overall interesting and odd choices, much better than seeing the usual ones (Horsea is really cute)
