>>36332407Hi. First of all, let me just say that what you posted here was problematic for a number of reasons. First of all, you assumed the gender of the poster you responded to, assuming the poster has a gender at all. Secondly, referring to him as "fragile" is extremely ableist, because it implies that being "fragile" is a negative thing instead of something that should be accepted and nurtured. Referring to the poster as a "manchild" is doubly problematic because not only are once again assuming the poster's gender (if they have one), you are also being extremely ableist by implying there is a difference between being a man (adult) and a child, when all ages should be treated equally.
When you state that no girl would fuck the poster, you also make some problematic assumptions about the poster's sexuality, assuming they have a sexuality. The poster may not be of a sexuality that includes girls, and your inability to specify what kinds of "girls" you mean could potentially be transphobic. I could point out the other issues in your post but at this point I would rather suggest that you go back to Tumblr, finish your indoctrination, and stay there.
