>>36349518>p-p-p-poorfag nonargument gets btfo>bros i have no /v/eddit reaction image for this w-what can i do>OH i can call him a character of my retarded boomer sitcoms, s-surely that'll make his argument invalid....looks like lgpe shills take another one, i have no possible rebuttal for this level of intellectual prowess
>>36349522It's a remake with LESS CONTENT than the one of 14 years ago, if you're such a testosterone deprived corporate bitch and falling into a blatant scam doesn't make mad, think about the consequences of supporting said scam will be in a long run. won't do much good for you if the games keep getting worse every installment, you want to have fun right?
