>>36374057The worst (non-)argument ever made.
I simply tell you that compared to the natural+cartoony design of Gen 1/2 Gen 5 is abstract art with looks of a monster-hunter game or anime art-work.
It is inferior and does not come close to the original, or the idea behind the original.
Some aspects of many Gen 5 Pokemon designs can be considered good, but not for beeing good Pokemon designs, but only for beeing nice designs.
Though many are edgy(not necessarily in the meme way), or have frays in their contours.
Gen 7 looks like it had a fusion with Yokai-Watch, if you are honest to yourself.
I bet my kidney that most of the people who complain about genwunners who aren't satisfied with Gen 5+ designs are either unaware of design-principles, contrarians or butthurt gen [insert number] fags.
>inb4 le assblasted X-fagMy point is that Pokemon designs started degenerating(not necessarily in the meme way) over time and that no matter which gen you are in favour of, we have to agree on some basis of design.
A Raticate, a wild rat with such a design, can be good, because it is simple and does not need to be more than it is, or should be.
It is the development of a normal-type you find on your first route on level two and perfectly reflects on how Pokemon takes inspiration from the real world.
If you are a weeb/otaku though who thinks "tha Pokemans are cute" you should kys.
