>>36479515>>36479467They are none of shit like this. There is no legit argument for these games because there is no legitimate audience.
>It's for existing players.Holy hell, no it's not. If it were, you don't remove anything. Especially not 4 core features and 80% of the titular characters.
>It's for children.No, it's not. The games already were. There are child, teen, and adult World Championship title holders. Children can and do understand the metagame which means playing through casually is not an issue for any of them. Well, any who don't sit around drooling, not even being capable of playing regardless of physical age.
>It's for nostalgia.No it's not. Muh childhood fags wants wild Pokémon battles and doesn't want anything to do with Megas or Alolan variants because they want what the games were just in HD.
>It's for Go players and/or people who just don't like Pokémon. to wean them into the main series.No it's not.
For starters, mobilefags whine about paying 10 bucks for a game on a system they probably have two or three of lying around the house just for their own personal usage, let alone 360 minimum. And yes, it's 360 despite what some moron was trying to argue the other day because the point is that these people don't own a dedicated game system meaning they would have to buy the damn Switch first and the intent would be that they do in this argument for it's existence.
Also factually this is true because Ishihara has talked about this specifically in interviews like they hadn't been doing it before, hadn't even comprehended that Pokémon was helping sell the systems (which I guess somewhat explains why GF never hit the system straight away in the past - they weren't even trying to probably because the majority of them wanted to actually release a complete game rather than rush shit out yearly unlike Masuda).
As for the latter, final nonsense debunking to come thanks to the character limit...
