>>36495619Define animal.
There are no animals that can consent because no animal is intelligent enough to be able to understand what they're consenting to entirely. But there would absolutely be Pokemon that pass the test as some of them have the ability to communciate via language with humans and fully understand what they mean and what is being said to them.
Let's say we discover out of fucking nowhere that centaurs are real. They can communicate with us and age at a similar rate as us (for convenience in this discussion). Are they animals? Is it bestiality to fuck a centaur? Is it wrong to fuck an adult centaur if both parties consent?
>but muh fictionalThe picture is fucking assuming fictional in the first place. There's no such thing as a non-fictional animal that passes that test. This entire discussion is about if fictional beings of varying intelligence would be considered culturally okay to fuck.
