>>36747885>backpedalingwhen have I? my argument has remained the same throughout my every post, lgpe will have an effect of the series if it sells good. everything that sells good eventually does, let's go itself is proof of go's success in drawing the casual audience prompted them to follow where the money went.
>The fact of the matter is, you're assuming the worst case scenario like it's a proven occurrence when for all you know LGPE will get mediocre sales and GF will sweep it and the casualized formula under the rug when people are already reacting poorly to it. now who's the backpedaling one? you went from ''i-it won't have any effect'' to ''well it could but you're assuming the worst'' faster than your average shill's performance in bed
besides if the scenario where it sells bad and no casualization happens has no relevance here, all I'm showing here is the indisputable fact that it selling good will prove casuals profitable and consequently push them towards making more casualized games.
>And even if we do continue getting LG games in the future, we'll have the usual mainline generation game to go with it.which will be adulterated with more casuals subtones since in the optimal scenario from a company standpoint they want as many casuals as possible to buy the main games as well.
