>>37271264I'd rather have fewer new pokemon AND have the new ones being quality.
How about a game where we only have a single box-cover trio, ONE event-only mon, ONE trio akin to the birds/beasts/regis, and that's it for legendaries?
How about we already have fucking enough generic regional rodents/birds/bugs/cats and don't include blatant fillermons?
I'd be okay with only having 60-70 new pokemon if those pokemon were ACTUALLY well designed instead of only having a handful of options once the "muh tradition" shit was factored out.