>>37295801Okay, updated my other one a bit to be more exact and idea filled since that was just off the top of my head in like 20 minutes.
Also, keep in mind as I've since posted that I'm not doing what I would want. I'm trying to balance the company and consumer desires. The point of this, in other words, was to imagine a path to keep the franchise profitable and the main series the main focus and all of it high quality.
I'd like to see a bunch of other games there personally. I really want another Pinball and Ranger, for example, they just don't make sense with trying to right the main series and give primarily older ones a go.
Just because you don't like a date or the lack of a game there doesn't mean you wouldn't enjoy the end result overall assuming you want to see the franchise at it's best. Those would come with time but what's there, there is a reason for all of it. Some haven't had games in ages and are highly wanted or, for example, the previously complained about Mystery Dungeon which with this one I've surely pissed them off more for, by moving it back from what I would've classed as early to mid in the old scheme.
Not out of spite for the faggot complaining about it but because I was already thinking about a Mystery Dungeon movie that year. I was thinking of releasing the game before it but after thinking about it to make this one, alongside would just be easier to market. Maybe even give out discount codes for people who saw it then to encourage turn over.
And as with all of these things I put up, this is by no means a perfect or even the only route to a better series that could've been, but it's certainly a better route than the high profit low quality path they've taken. If you disagree come up with your own
I wouldn't mind some laughs as you show us lists of why you shouldn't be anywhere near a business at all, let alone this one. 
