>>37365468>valid reasonOh, so you can dismiss any point of criticism that anybody brings up as invalid because you disagree with it? But sure, I'll give you some reasons.
>HydreigonIs officially based on something that it has absolutely no resemblance to.
>HaxorusSuch a shitty design that people interpret its blades as mandibles. Because having an axe for a head is stupid.
>VolcaronaIt's just a fat bug. What's good about it?
>GolurkDoesn't look like either a Ground type or a Ghost type. Total failure of a design.
>BraviaryIt's just a fucking bird
>MienshaoNonsensical design. It's a weasel but it's also a Shaolin monk. Nothing interesting or creative about just mashing random ideas together.
>GalvantulaIt's just a fucking spider
>ArcheopsNo complaints, good design
>CarracostaYeah, we really needed another fucking turtle Pokemon
>BisharpRandom blades at its midsection add absolutely nothing to the design and make no sense
>ZoroarkCheap attempt at Lucario 2.0 whose gimmick was made invalid in the same gen it was introduced
>FerrothornNot much to say either way. Very generic design, not memorable.
>KrookodileNo complaints, good design
>LeavannySame as Mienshao. Mashing together mantises and nannies does not an interesting design make.
>ScolipedeNo complaints, good design.
>Escavalier>AccelgorSee Mienshao and and Leavanny. Neither of them even make sense considering their pre-evolutions.
