>>37380529Nah. I don't see what's bad about immortality, it's a bless. Basically, you'd have time to do anything.
>>37380541it wouldn't be pointless for the time it lasts, and you could continue making interactions forever, seeing also how humans or whatever other species evolve, and meeting infinite different individuals, it's just awesome. What you said anyway it's not so different from what can happen in a normal life. It happens continuosly that people lose other people, or animals, many times during the time of a normal life
All the other things you said depend on how it works. At a certain point your brain might be incapable of adding new memories, but that could also mean that you'd simply forget the older and most irrelevant things, like it happens in a normal life moreover. And who knows if future technology will allow expansions of the body's capabilities, brain included, even if that could take really a lot of time, eventually you'll reach it, being immortal.
It could be an immortality where you can die if you get hurt, but you just don't age, or you age in a different way without dying because of it, and you don't get any natural disease
